SAMPLE. Three real projects, shown as historical sample records, not live coverage. They are shown the way a subscriber sees a reviewed record, a timeline, the weekly brief and the exports, so you can judge the product on real municipal documents. Nothing here is live coverage: these records are not counted on the coverage page, were not published through review, and are not emailed. Every document behind them is a real municipal file, cited to the page, paragraph or item it supports.
See the Data Center section on three real projects
Three historical projects from public municipal records, shown through the same screens a subscriber uses. Each card is what a subscriber sees first; the full evidence, timeline and the weekly brief they came from are beneath each one.
Watch the data center walkthrough · 2:41
How to read these labelled historical samples: the last recorded action, the next step, what is still unknown, and the source behind each one.
Recorded September 2026 using historical records; the site may have changed since. Not a live feed.
Read the transcript
A data-center proposal can matter to land brokers, infrastructure suppliers and site-selection teams for very different reasons. The first job is to work out what is actually documented. P&Z Radar’s Data Center section brings project information and its public evidence together. Let’s see how you could use it to build a more focused research shortlist before investing time in a possible opportunity.
You can inspect sample records before starting a trial. These are clearly labelled historical examples, shown through the product’s interface. They are not today’s live coverage. Look at how a card separates the last recorded action, the next step, relevant audiences and what is still unknown. That structure helps you decide which questions deserve attention without treating every headline as the same kind of opportunity.
Take a historical example and follow its timeline. A proposal, a recommendation and an adopted decision are different events. So are a delayed hearing and a cancelled project. Read the dated action and its citation together. If the next-step date has already passed, that is a reason to find a newer source, not a reason to repeat it as an upcoming event. The evidence trail gives your research a place to begin.
A land broker might shortlist proposals near a target area and investigate the named parties. A supplier might look for a project whose scope matches its services. A site-selection team might compare planning stages and local policy questions. In each case, write down the project, source, current question and next research action. A public filing is not a verified buyer contact, an open tender, available land or a promise of utility capacity.
Before signing up, check the coverage page for your market. It distinguishes watched sources and reviewed projects, and shows when sources were read. A city can be watched without having a reviewed data-center project to show. This is not a nationwide inventory of every facility. The right test is whether the records in your area answer questions you would otherwise spend time researching manually.
The separate Data Center trial is offered without a card. The page explains that you receive a workspace link, then start the trial inside the account when there is a reviewed project to see. It describes access to reviewed records, timelines, tracking, a weekly brief and exports. Use the trial to investigate one real project and build one useful shortlist. Then decide whether the evidence and workflow fit your work. Start with the sample, and check your market first.
tabled — development agreement 2026-08-17 · Westlake Town Council (special meeting) — tabled after a Tarrant County judge's temporary hold
Next step
A Tarrant County judge is expected to hear the matter at a hearing set for 10 am on August 26th — 2026-08-26 (past)
Who acts
Investors / lenders / analysts, Developers / site selectors, Public affairs / community, Utilities / infrastructure, Equipment / construction suppliers
Why it matters
a Tarrant County judge put a temporary hold on the project. Because of the court order, the Town Council cannot act on the agreement at this time
IT load
not stated
Still unknown
site-plan application/case number (not in packet text); IT load / critical capacity in MW (only 300 MW utility capacity and a 350 MW substation are stated)
Ordinance No. 7520 ... approving a Change in Zoning from Agricultural (AG) District to a Planned Development (PD) District based in the Community Office (CO) District and 2) a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on a 48.93-acre tract of land located at 2000 Holford Road
IT load
not stated
Still unknown
IT load / critical capacity: the Detail Plan sheets label each of three buildings '2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER' (fileId 842 pp.24–27; fileId 285 pp.194–197) without saying what the 48 MW is — recorded as unspecified capacity claims; no IT, critical, utility or substation figure is stated; tenant identity (three tenants are mentioned, none named)
recommended for approval — rezoning / PD 2026-09-01 · Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission — public hearing 2026-09-01; Town Staff recommended approval
Next step
Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center ... (ZONE-26-0007), agenda item 4 — 2026-09-01 (past)
Who acts
Developers / site selectors, Investors / lenders / analysts, Public affairs / community, Utilities / infrastructure, Equipment / construction suppliers
Why it matters
Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center
IT load
not stated
Still unknown
IT load / critical capacity: no megawatt, kilovolt or square-footage figure for the facility appears in the agenda or the 104-page packet; only the tract (37.273 acres) and 20 percent lot coverage are stated; the commission's action on 2026-09-01: press reports a 7–0 recommendation of denial; not in any fetched document
The Monday brief as it would list the Westlake, TX records: each item names the change, the body, the date and the source.
Reporting period: 2026-09-09 to 2026-09-09. 1 project with newly observed or changed records (5 records) in this period.
Coverage: UNVERIFIED — sample or test records only; no live monitoring occurred.
SAMPLE: historical sample records shown for inspection, not live coverage; this is not a live reporting window
Executive summary
Circle T Data Center Campus (Westlake) — new track: development_agreement tabled (2026-08-17) — Westlake Town Council (special meeting) — tabled after a Tarrant County judge's temporary hold; next: A Tarrant County judge is expected to hear the matter at a hearing set for 10 am on August 26th 2026-08-26 (past)
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
2026-08-17 — Westlake Town Council (special meeting) — tabled after a Tarrant County judge's temporary hold · Westlake, Tarrant County (first observed by us 2026-09-09)
What changed
new track: development_agreement tabled (2026-08-17). uncertain — Westlake Town Council (special meeting) — tabled after a Tarrant County judge's temporary hold, 2026-08-17; 23 days since this action
Why it matters
litigation — a Tarrant County judge put a temporary hold on the project. Because of the court order, the Town Council cannot act on the agreement at this time source, News flash 825, paragraphs 1-2
entitlement step — The Office of the Town Manager recommends approval of the development agreement as presented source, p.5
conditions — The development agreement --- and the ability of the Developer to receive a certificate of occupancy to operate the data center are predicated upon the Developer's compliance with the directive from the Governor concerning the comprehensive data center audit process that ... will be performed by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) source, pp.3-4
conditions — In the event that the Developer is unable to receive the appropriate documentation from the PUCT and ERCOT ... the Town Manager may request that the Developer repurpose the buildings on the site for another land use source, p.4
water — cooling system designed to achieve an annual water usage effectiveness (WUE) not to exceed 0.25L/kWh as a long-term average source, p.4
conditions — heightened mitigation efforts for noise reduction ... acoustic louvers, berms, and sound barrier walls ... a report within 180 days following the completion of construction that demonstrates that the development is compliant with the Town's Code of Ordinances regulating noise source, p.4
One-time financial contribution — a one-time financial contribution to the Town in an amount not to exceed $914,000.00 to upgrade piping at the pump station ... to be paid to the Town within 30 calendar days of the execution of the development agreement source, pp.4-5
schedule — no grading activities will be allowed to commence unless and until the grading plans and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer source, p.4
Resolution 26-25 would approve a Development Agreement for Subdivision Improvements between the Town and Circle T Owner, LP: one-time contribution up to $914,000 for pump-station piping (due within 30 days of execution); cooling system WUE not to exceed 0.25 L/kWh long-term average; acoustic louvers, berms and sound walls plus a noise-compliance report within 180 days of construction completion; PUCT/ERCOT audit documentation under the Governor's 2026-08-03 directive required before a final certificate of occupancy, failing which the Town Manager may require the buildings be repurposed; no grading until Town Engineer approves grading/drainage plans. Council unanimously TABLED it because a Tarrant County judge placed a temporary hold; a court hearing was set for 10 am 2026-08-26 and a vote was to be scheduled afterwards.
Who should act
Investors / lenders / analysts / Developers / site selectors / Public affairs / community: a Tarrant County judge put a temporary hold on the project. Because of the court order, the Town Council cannot act on the agreement at this time (derived from a stated litigation factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: The Office of the Town Manager recommends approval of the development agreement as presented (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts / Utilities / infrastructure: The development agreement --- and the ability of the Developer to receive a certificate of occupancy to operate the data center are predicated upon the Developer's compliance with the directive from the Governor concerning the comprehensive data center audit process that ... will be performed by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts: In the event that the Developer is unable to receive the appropriate documentation from the PUCT and ERCOT ... the Town Manager may request that the Developer repurpose the buildings on the site for another land use (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Equipment / construction suppliers / Public affairs / community: cooling system designed to achieve an annual water usage effectiveness (WUE) not to exceed 0.25L/kWh as a long-term average (derived from a stated water factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers / Public affairs / community: heightened mitigation efforts for noise reduction ... acoustic louvers, berms, and sound barrier walls ... a report within 180 days following the completion of construction that demonstrates that the development is compliant with the Town's Code of Ordinances regulating noise (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts / Utilities / infrastructure: a one-time financial contribution to the Town in an amount not to exceed $914,000.00 to upgrade piping at the pump station ... to be paid to the Town within 30 calendar days of the execution of the development agreement (derived from a stated One-time financial contribution factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers: no grading activities will be allowed to commence unless and until the grading plans and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer (derived from a stated schedule factor)source
What to do next
Look up: A Tarrant County judge is expected to hear the matter at a hearing set for 10 am on August 26th — Tarrant County district court, 2026-08-26 (past — outcome not in the sources) source
Monitor: Afterward, the Town will schedule a meeting to vote on the development agreement — Westlake Town Council [development agreement], date not stated (expected) source
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: stated
how this was derived
litigation (stated, impedes): a Tarrant County judge put a temporary hold on the project. Because of the court order, the Town Council cannot act on the agreement at this time
entitlement_step (stated, advances): The Office of the Town Manager recommends approval of the development agreement as presented
conditions (stated, impedes): The development agreement --- and the ability of the Developer to receive a certificate of occupancy to operate the data center are predicated upon the Developer's compliance with the directive from the Governor concerning the comprehensive data center audit process that ... will be performed by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)
conditions (stated, impedes): In the event that the Developer is unable to receive the appropriate documentation from the PUCT and ERCOT ... the Town Manager may request that the Developer repurpose the buildings on the site for another land use
water (stated, neutral): cooling system designed to achieve an annual water usage effectiveness (WUE) not to exceed 0.25L/kWh as a long-term average
conditions (stated, neutral): heightened mitigation efforts for noise reduction ... acoustic louvers, berms, and sound barrier walls ... a report within 180 days following the completion of construction that demonstrates that the development is compliant with the Town's Code of Ordinances regulating noise
other (stated, neutral): a one-time financial contribution to the Town in an amount not to exceed $914,000.00 to upgrade piping at the pump station ... to be paid to the Town within 30 calendar days of the execution of the development agreement
schedule (stated, neutral): no grading activities will be allowed to commence unless and until the grading plans and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Still unknown
site-plan application/case number (not in packet text)
IT load / critical capacity in MW (only 300 MW utility capacity and a 350 MW substation are stated)
tenant identity
outcome of the 2026-08-26 Tarrant County hearing, the cause number and the plaintiff
whether the development agreement has since been voted on (nothing after 2026-08-18 found)
P&Z 2026-08-04 minutes (not yet published on CivicClerk at retrieval time)
council vote count on Ordinance 1015 (2025-01-06 minutes are a scanned image; OCR not run)
the applicant for the 2024–25 PD 3-8 text amendment (unnamed in the packet text)
Separate track from seq 4: tabling the agreement does not undo the site-plan approval; conversely no building or grading permit can issue until the agreement is approved (P&Z packet p.41–42).
The August 26 hearing's outcome, cause number and plaintiff are in no preserved document. CivicClerk shows no council event between 2026-08-18 and 2026-09-01 other than the 08-25 Board of Trustees; the 2026-08-18 regular-meeting recap (826) has no data-center item.
Status as of 2026-09-09 is unknown from these sources.
Timeline
5 records of this project in the period; the current state above is the latest.
Unknown — proposal — Town of Westlake / City of Keller / Hillwood Properties (pre-application meeting)
2024-12-10 — proposal — Westlake Planning & Zoning Commission (recommendation only, 5-1-1 with one absence)
2025-01-06 — approved — Westlake Town Council — Ordinance No. 1015 adopted after public hearing (File # ORD-1015, agenda item F.2)
2026-08-04 — approved — Westlake Planning & Zoning Commission (site plan, with three added conditions)
2026-08-17 — uncertain — Westlake Town Council (special meeting) — tabled after a Tarrant County judge's temporary hold (current)
Westlake, TX — Circle T data center (2024–2026)
5 records from 15 cited source documents. Westlake, TX — Circle T Data Center Campus. Historical sample records built from the Town's own published documents (news flashes, its data-center P&Z presentation, FAQs, white papers and generator notes, P&Z and council meeting packets, and council minutes), preserved 2026-09-09. The original documents and their page text are kept outside this site, with a fingerprint (SHA-256) of each original on file. Not a live lead: nothing after 2026-08-18 is known.
Timeline and every record's evidence card
Timeline
undated — proposal · Town of Westlake / City of Keller / Hillwood Properties (pre-application meeting) · record
2024-12-10 — proposal · Westlake Planning & Zoning Commission (recommendation only, 5-1-1 with one absence) · record
2025-01-06 — approved · Westlake Town Council — Ordinance No. 1015 adopted after public hearing (File # ORD-1015, agenda item F.2) · record
2026-08-04 — approved · Westlake Planning & Zoning Commission (site plan, with three added conditions) · record
2026-08-17 — uncertain · Westlake Town Council (special meeting) — tabled after a Tarrant County judge's temporary hold · record
Evidence cards
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Circle T Data Center Campus — Circle T Ranch
Municipality
Westlake
County
Tarrant
Address / location
Northeast corner of US Highway 377 and Westport Parkway, Westlake, TX (PD 3-8, Office/Industrial Sub-District); developer's deck gives 13572 N Main Street, Westlake, TX 76262
Developer
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
Unknown
Source published
2026-08-01
Meeting date
Unknown
First observed by us
2026-09-09
Stage
proposal
Reviewing body (not a final decision)
Town of Westlake / City of Keller / Hillwood Properties (pre-application meeting)
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
Unknown
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
In December 2024 Westlake, Keller and Hillwood leaders met to discuss the proposed development, including a preliminary site plan, location, size, noise, water and electrical infrastructure.
A pre-application meeting, not a filing; the earliest dated event the Town itself cites.
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
conditions — Westlake committed to working with the developer to: position the facility as far north on the property as possible, exceeding the planned development's required setback; ensure the facility complies with Westlake's noise ordinance; require extensive landscape screening, including mature vegetation source, News flash 821, paragraph 4
opposition — some concerns have been raised by residents in the City of Keller due to the project's proximity to the Keller city limits source, News flash 821, paragraph 1
support from Keller's leadership team — At the conclusion of that meeting, the project was met with support from Keller's leadership team, which expressed the belief that the development would have minimal impact on Keller residents source, News flash 821, paragraph 5
In December 2024 Westlake, Keller and Hillwood leaders met to discuss the proposed development, including a preliminary site plan, location, size, noise, water and electrical infrastructure.
Who should act
Developers / site selectors / Public affairs / community: Westlake committed to working with the developer to: position the facility as far north on the property as possible, exceeding the planned development's required setback; ensure the facility complies with Westlake's noise ordinance; require extensive landscape screening, including mature vegetation (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Public affairs / community: some concerns have been raised by residents in the City of Keller due to the project's proximity to the Keller city limits (derived from a stated opposition factor)source
Public affairs / community: At the conclusion of that meeting, the project was met with support from Keller's leadership team, which expressed the belief that the development would have minimal impact on Keller residents (derived from a stated support from Keller's leadership team factor)source
What to do next
no dated next step in the sources
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-09 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: agreement pending
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
text_amendment: approved (2025-01-06)
site_plan: approved (2026-08-04)
development_agreement: tabled (2026-08-17)
Momentum: stalled
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
2026-08-04 site_plan: approved
2026-08-17 development_agreement: tabled
latest action tabled stalls
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: stated
how this was derived
conditions (stated, neutral): Westlake committed to working with the developer to: position the facility as far north on the property as possible, exceeding the planned development's required setback; ensure the facility complies with Westlake's noise ordinance; require extensive landscape screening, including mature vegetation
opposition (stated, impedes): some concerns have been raised by residents in the City of Keller due to the project's proximity to the Keller city limits
other (stated, advances): At the conclusion of that meeting, the project was met with support from Keller's leadership team, which expressed the belief that the development would have minimal impact on Keller residents
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Circle T Data Center Campus — Circle T Ranch
Municipality
Westlake
County
Tarrant
Address / location
Northeast corner of US Highway 377 and Westport Parkway, Westlake, TX (PD 3-8, Office/Industrial Sub-District); developer's deck gives 13572 N Main Street, Westlake, TX 76262
Developer
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
Unknown
Source published
Unknown
Meeting date
2024-12-10
First observed by us
2026-09-09
Stage
proposal
Reviewing body (not a final decision)
Westlake Planning & Zoning Commission (recommendation only, 5-1-1 with one absence)
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
Unknown
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
P&Z recommended approval of the PD 3-8 text amendments (which add 'Data Center — permitted by right in the Office/Industrial sub-area and by SUP in the Office sub-area', and 'Electrical Substations — permitted by right in the Office and Office/Industrial sub-areas instead of by SUP').
A recommendation, not a decision (regression c). The applicant for the text amendment is referred to only as 'the applicant'/'the developer' in the packet text; not named.
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
entitlement step — Data Center --- to be permitted by right in the Office/Industrial sub-area and by an SUP in the Office sub-area source, p.33
capacity power — Electrical Substations --- to be permitted by right in the Office and Office/Industrial sub-areas instead of by Specific Use Permit source, p.33
entitlement step — a formal site plan submittal would still be required to be submitted that would proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation and subsequent consideration by the Town Council source, p.33
conditions — staff condition 1: After site plans have been submitted for the first data center in the Office / Industrial Sub-district for review and approval; each successive data center thereafter shall require a SUP source, p.35
conditions — staff condition 2: for the first data center in the Office/Industrial Sub-district only, the exterior finish material requirements and other architectural features contained in the building quality manual only apply to the building facades facing United States Highway 377 and residential properties source, p.35
P&Z recommended approval of the PD 3-8 text amendments (which add 'Data Center — permitted by right in the Office/Industrial sub-area and by SUP in the Office sub-area', and 'Electrical Substations — permitted by right in the Office and Office/Industrial sub-areas instead of by SUP').
Who should act
Developers / site selectors: Data Center --- to be permitted by right in the Office/Industrial sub-area and by an SUP in the Office sub-area (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure: Electrical Substations --- to be permitted by right in the Office and Office/Industrial sub-areas instead of by Specific Use Permit (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: a formal site plan submittal would still be required to be submitted that would proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation and subsequent consideration by the Town Council (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Developers / site selectors: staff condition 1: After site plans have been submitted for the first data center in the Office / Industrial Sub-district for review and approval; each successive data center thereafter shall require a SUP (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Equipment / construction suppliers: staff condition 2: for the first data center in the Office/Industrial Sub-district only, the exterior finish material requirements and other architectural features contained in the building quality manual only apply to the building facades facing United States Highway 377 and residential properties (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
What to do next
Monitor: Hold a public hearing, discuss, consider and act to adopt Ordinance 1015 approving text amendments to PD 3-8 (File # ORD-1015, agenda item F.2) — Westlake Town Council [text amendment], 2025-01-06 (scheduled) source
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-09 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: agreement pending
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
text_amendment: approved (2025-01-06)
site_plan: approved (2026-08-04)
development_agreement: tabled (2026-08-17)
Momentum: stalled
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
2026-08-04 site_plan: approved
2026-08-17 development_agreement: tabled
latest action tabled stalls
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: none stated
how this was derived
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Data Center --- to be permitted by right in the Office/Industrial sub-area and by an SUP in the Office sub-area
capacity_power (stated, advances): Electrical Substations --- to be permitted by right in the Office and Office/Industrial sub-areas instead of by Specific Use Permit
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): a formal site plan submittal would still be required to be submitted that would proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation and subsequent consideration by the Town Council
conditions (stated, neutral): staff condition 1: After site plans have been submitted for the first data center in the Office / Industrial Sub-district for review and approval; each successive data center thereafter shall require a SUP
conditions (stated, advances): staff condition 2: for the first data center in the Office/Industrial Sub-district only, the exterior finish material requirements and other architectural features contained in the building quality manual only apply to the building facades facing United States Highway 377 and residential properties
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Circle T Data Center Campus — Circle T Ranch
Municipality
Westlake
County
Tarrant
Address / location
Northeast corner of US Highway 377 and Westport Parkway, Westlake, TX (PD 3-8, Office/Industrial Sub-District); developer's deck gives 13572 N Main Street, Westlake, TX 76262
Developer
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
Unknown
Source published
Unknown
Meeting date
2025-01-06
First observed by us
2026-09-09
Stage
approved
Decided by
Westlake Town Council — Ordinance No. 1015 adopted after public hearing (File # ORD-1015, agenda item F.2)
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
Unknown
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
Text amendments to PD 3-8 ('generally located at the southeast corner of U.S. Highway 377 and State Highway 170'; Circle T Ranch, Ordinances 307/314 of 1998-09-14, 322 of 1998-12-14, 438 of 2003-06-09, 592 of 2008-04-24). Staff recommended approval with seven conditions, including the note that after the FIRST data center's site plan in the Office/Industrial Sub-district each successive data center requires an SUP, and that the building-quality-manual façade rules apply only to façades facing US 377 and residential properties for that first data center. Also raises Office/Industrial max height to 80 ft and lot coverage to 70%.
The council vote count is in the 2025-01-06 minutes (fileId 93), which are image-only (0 extractable characters) — not read. Adoption is established by the later staff report and resolution, not by minutes text.
The use approval is a separate track from the 2026 site plan.
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
entitlement step — a data center is allowed by-right within the Office / Industrial Sub-District source, p.40
conditions — after site plans have been submitted for the first data center in the Office / Industrial Sub-district for review and approval, that each successive data center thereafter shall require a specific use permit source, p.40
entitlement step — site plan approval (subject to review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission) is required prior to the issuance of development permits and building permits source, p.41
entitlement step — a development agreement is also required ... grading permits and building permits may not be issued until the development agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Town Council source, p.41
Text amendments to PD 3-8 ('generally located at the southeast corner of U.S. Highway 377 and State Highway 170'; Circle T Ranch, Ordinances 307/314 of 1998-09-14, 322 of 1998-12-14, 438 of 2003-06-09, 592 of 2008-04-24). Staff recommended approval with seven conditions, including the note that after the FIRST data center's site plan in the Office/Industrial Sub-district each successive data center requires an SUP, and that the building-quality-manual façade rules apply only to façades facing US 377 and residential properties for that first data center. Also raises Office/Industrial max height to 80 ft and lot coverage to 70%.
Who should act
Developers / site selectors: a data center is allowed by-right within the Office / Industrial Sub-District (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Developers / site selectors: after site plans have been submitted for the first data center in the Office / Industrial Sub-district for review and approval, that each successive data center thereafter shall require a specific use permit (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: site plan approval (subject to review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission) is required prior to the issuance of development permits and building permits (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts / Equipment / construction suppliers: a development agreement is also required ... grading permits and building permits may not be issued until the development agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Town Council (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
What to do next
Monitor: site plan approval (subject to review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission) is required prior to the issuance of development permits and building permits — Westlake Planning and Zoning Commission [site plan], date not stated (expected) source
Monitor: a development agreement ... reviewed and approved by the Town Council — Westlake Town Council [development agreement], date not stated (expected) source
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-09 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: agreement pending
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
text_amendment: approved (2025-01-06)
site_plan: approved (2026-08-04)
development_agreement: tabled (2026-08-17)
Momentum: stalled
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
2026-08-04 site_plan: approved
2026-08-17 development_agreement: tabled
latest action tabled stalls
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: none stated
how this was derived
entitlement_step (stated, advances): a data center is allowed by-right within the Office / Industrial Sub-District
conditions (stated, neutral): after site plans have been submitted for the first data center in the Office / Industrial Sub-district for review and approval, that each successive data center thereafter shall require a specific use permit
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): site plan approval (subject to review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission) is required prior to the issuance of development permits and building permits
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): a development agreement is also required ... grading permits and building permits may not be issued until the development agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Town Council
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Circle T Data Center Campus — Circle T Ranch
Municipality
Westlake
County
Tarrant
Address / location
Northeast corner of US Highway 377 and Westport Parkway, Westlake, TX (PD 3-8, Office/Industrial Sub-District); developer's deck gives 13572 N Main Street, Westlake, TX 76262
Developer
Circle T Owner, LP
Applicant
Kimley-Horn
Owner
Circle T Owner, LP
Source published
2026-08-05
Meeting date
2026-08-04
First observed by us
2026-09-09
Stage
approved
Decided by
Westlake Planning & Zoning Commission (site plan, with three added conditions)
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
300 MW — campus utility capacity (p.6; also 'PH Circle T [300 MW]' on the portfolio map p.3): CAPACITY / UTILITY PROVIDER 300 MW / Oncor — source
350 MW — substation (p.3; also the FAQ web page and white paper p.2 ('dropping a 350-megawatt substation near the pump station'); the substation itself needs its own future site plan (P&Z packet p.41)): A new 350-megawatt substation … Paid for entirely by the developer — source
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
Site plan for a data center on ~87.96 acres at the NE corner of US 377 and Westport Pkwy, PD 3-8. Staff: substantially complies with the UDC and PD 3-8; recommends approval. P&Z approved with three conditions: 8-ft berm or sound wall on the south line; acoustic barriers/louvers around HVAC, cooling towers and generators; more evergreen/hardwood screening. Four buildings, private substation and backup generators (substation/switchyard excluded from this approval).
The vote itself is known from the Town's recap and the later resolution recital, not from minutes — the P&Z minutes for 2026-08-04 were not in the events returned (no 'Minutes' file on that event yet).
A site-plan approval, not a use decision and not the development agreement.
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
capacity power — a four-building data center campus that includes a private electrical substation and backup generators source, News flash 822, paragraph 2
opposition — several hours of public comment from neighboring property owners ... concerns about potential noise, visual impacts, and how the project could affect nearby neighborhoods source, News flash 822, paragraphs 1 and 4
conditions — the Planning & Zoning Commission requested several additional improvements ... an 8-foot berm or sound barrier wall along the southern property line, additional architectural sound barriers or acoustic louvers around mechanical equipment such as HVAC units, cooling towers, and generators, and more evergreen and hardwood trees source, News flash 822, paragraph 5
land — a data center on approximately 87.96 acres of land generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of United States Highway 377 and Westport Parkway ... in PD, Planned Development District 3-8 source, p.40
entitlement step — the switchyard and the sub-station, while shown on the site plan, are not part of the site plan review and approval and will require separate site plans for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission source, p.41
schedule — No construction is permitted to take place on the site until the development agreement has been approved by the Town Council source, p.42
entitlement step — Under the property's existing Planned Development zoning (PD-3-8), data centers are already permitted on that land ... the commission's responsibility was limited to determining whether the site plan complied source, News flash 822, paragraph 6
Site plan for a data center on ~87.96 acres at the NE corner of US 377 and Westport Pkwy, PD 3-8. Staff: substantially complies with the UDC and PD 3-8; recommends approval. P&Z approved with three conditions: 8-ft berm or sound wall on the south line; acoustic barriers/louvers around HVAC, cooling towers and generators; more evergreen/hardwood screening. Four buildings, private substation and backup generators (substation/switchyard excluded from this approval). Capacity as stated: 300 MW — campus utility capacity (p.6; also 'PH Circle T [300 MW]' on the portfolio map p.3) <https://www.westlake-tx.org/DocumentCenter/View/6805/Data-Center-P-and-Z-Presentation>; 350 MW — substation (p.3; also the FAQ web page and white paper p.2 ('dropping a 350-megawatt substation near the pump station'); the substation itself needs its own future site plan (P&Z packet p.41)) <https://www.westlake-tx.org/DocumentCenter/View/6810/Data-Center-FAQ2>
Who should act
Utilities / infrastructure / Equipment / construction suppliers: a four-building data center campus that includes a private electrical substation and backup generators (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Public affairs / community: several hours of public comment from neighboring property owners ... concerns about potential noise, visual impacts, and how the project could affect nearby neighborhoods (derived from a stated opposition factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers / Developers / site selectors: the Planning & Zoning Commission requested several additional improvements ... an 8-foot berm or sound barrier wall along the southern property line, additional architectural sound barriers or acoustic louvers around mechanical equipment such as HVAC units, cooling towers, and generators, and more evergreen and hardwood trees (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Developers / site selectors: a data center on approximately 87.96 acres of land generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of United States Highway 377 and Westport Parkway ... in PD, Planned Development District 3-8 (derived from a stated land factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Developers / site selectors: the switchyard and the sub-station, while shown on the site plan, are not part of the site plan review and approval and will require separate site plans for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts / Equipment / construction suppliers: No construction is permitted to take place on the site until the development agreement has been approved by the Town Council (derived from a stated schedule factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Under the property's existing Planned Development zoning (PD-3-8), data centers are already permitted on that land ... the commission's responsibility was limited to determining whether the site plan complied (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
What to do next
Monitor: Resolution 26-25 approving a Development Agreement between the Town of Westlake, Texas and Circle T Owner, LP (agenda item E.1, special meeting) — Westlake Town Council [development agreement], 2026-08-17 (scheduled) source
Monitor: separate site plans for the switchyard and the sub-station for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission — Westlake Planning and Zoning Commission [site plan], date not stated (expected) source
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-09 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: agreement pending
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
text_amendment: approved (2025-01-06)
site_plan: approved (2026-08-04)
development_agreement: tabled (2026-08-17)
Momentum: stalled
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
2026-08-04 site_plan: approved
2026-08-17 development_agreement: tabled
latest action tabled stalls
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: stated
how this was derived
capacity_power (stated, neutral): a four-building data center campus that includes a private electrical substation and backup generators
opposition (stated, impedes): several hours of public comment from neighboring property owners ... concerns about potential noise, visual impacts, and how the project could affect nearby neighborhoods
conditions (stated, neutral): the Planning & Zoning Commission requested several additional improvements ... an 8-foot berm or sound barrier wall along the southern property line, additional architectural sound barriers or acoustic louvers around mechanical equipment such as HVAC units, cooling towers, and generators, and more evergreen and hardwood trees
land (stated, neutral): a data center on approximately 87.96 acres of land generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of United States Highway 377 and Westport Parkway ... in PD, Planned Development District 3-8
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): the switchyard and the sub-station, while shown on the site plan, are not part of the site plan review and approval and will require separate site plans for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission
schedule (stated, impedes): No construction is permitted to take place on the site until the development agreement has been approved by the Town Council
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Under the property's existing Planned Development zoning (PD-3-8), data centers are already permitted on that land ... the commission's responsibility was limited to determining whether the site plan complied
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Circle T Data Center Campus — Circle T Ranch
Municipality
Westlake
County
Tarrant
Address / location
Northeast corner of US Highway 377 and Westport Parkway, Westlake, TX (PD 3-8, Office/Industrial Sub-District); developer's deck gives 13572 N Main Street, Westlake, TX 76262
Developer
Circle T Owner, LP
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
Circle T Owner, LP
Source published
2026-08-18
Meeting date
2026-08-17
First observed by us
2026-09-09
Stage
uncertain
Reviewing body (not a final decision)
Westlake Town Council (special meeting) — tabled after a Tarrant County judge's temporary hold
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
Unknown
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
Resolution 26-25 would approve a Development Agreement for Subdivision Improvements between the Town and Circle T Owner, LP: one-time contribution up to $914,000 for pump-station piping (due within 30 days of execution); cooling system WUE not to exceed 0.25 L/kWh long-term average; acoustic louvers, berms and sound walls plus a noise-compliance report within 180 days of construction completion; PUCT/ERCOT audit documentation under the Governor's 2026-08-03 directive required before a final certificate of occupancy, failing which the Town Manager may require the buildings be repurposed; no grading until Town Engineer approves grading/drainage plans. Council unanimously TABLED it because a Tarrant County judge placed a temporary hold; a court hearing was set for 10 am 2026-08-26 and a vote was to be scheduled afterwards.
Separate track from seq 4: tabling the agreement does not undo the site-plan approval; conversely no building or grading permit can issue until the agreement is approved (P&Z packet p.41–42).
The August 26 hearing's outcome, cause number and plaintiff are in no preserved document. CivicClerk shows no council event between 2026-08-18 and 2026-09-01 other than the 08-25 Board of Trustees; the 2026-08-18 regular-meeting recap (826) has no data-center item.
Status as of 2026-09-09 is unknown from these sources.
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
litigation — a Tarrant County judge put a temporary hold on the project. Because of the court order, the Town Council cannot act on the agreement at this time source, News flash 825, paragraphs 1-2
entitlement step — The Office of the Town Manager recommends approval of the development agreement as presented source, p.5
conditions — The development agreement --- and the ability of the Developer to receive a certificate of occupancy to operate the data center are predicated upon the Developer's compliance with the directive from the Governor concerning the comprehensive data center audit process that ... will be performed by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) source, pp.3-4
conditions — In the event that the Developer is unable to receive the appropriate documentation from the PUCT and ERCOT ... the Town Manager may request that the Developer repurpose the buildings on the site for another land use source, p.4
water — cooling system designed to achieve an annual water usage effectiveness (WUE) not to exceed 0.25L/kWh as a long-term average source, p.4
conditions — heightened mitigation efforts for noise reduction ... acoustic louvers, berms, and sound barrier walls ... a report within 180 days following the completion of construction that demonstrates that the development is compliant with the Town's Code of Ordinances regulating noise source, p.4
One-time financial contribution — a one-time financial contribution to the Town in an amount not to exceed $914,000.00 to upgrade piping at the pump station ... to be paid to the Town within 30 calendar days of the execution of the development agreement source, pp.4-5
schedule — no grading activities will be allowed to commence unless and until the grading plans and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer source, p.4
Resolution 26-25 would approve a Development Agreement for Subdivision Improvements between the Town and Circle T Owner, LP: one-time contribution up to $914,000 for pump-station piping (due within 30 days of execution); cooling system WUE not to exceed 0.25 L/kWh long-term average; acoustic louvers, berms and sound walls plus a noise-compliance report within 180 days of construction completion; PUCT/ERCOT audit documentation under the Governor's 2026-08-03 directive required before a final certificate of occupancy, failing which the Town Manager may require the buildings be repurposed; no grading until Town Engineer approves grading/drainage plans. Council unanimously TABLED it because a Tarrant County judge placed a temporary hold; a court hearing was set for 10 am 2026-08-26 and a vote was to be scheduled afterwards.
Who should act
Investors / lenders / analysts / Developers / site selectors / Public affairs / community: a Tarrant County judge put a temporary hold on the project. Because of the court order, the Town Council cannot act on the agreement at this time (derived from a stated litigation factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: The Office of the Town Manager recommends approval of the development agreement as presented (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts / Utilities / infrastructure: The development agreement --- and the ability of the Developer to receive a certificate of occupancy to operate the data center are predicated upon the Developer's compliance with the directive from the Governor concerning the comprehensive data center audit process that ... will be performed by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts: In the event that the Developer is unable to receive the appropriate documentation from the PUCT and ERCOT ... the Town Manager may request that the Developer repurpose the buildings on the site for another land use (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Equipment / construction suppliers / Public affairs / community: cooling system designed to achieve an annual water usage effectiveness (WUE) not to exceed 0.25L/kWh as a long-term average (derived from a stated water factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers / Public affairs / community: heightened mitigation efforts for noise reduction ... acoustic louvers, berms, and sound barrier walls ... a report within 180 days following the completion of construction that demonstrates that the development is compliant with the Town's Code of Ordinances regulating noise (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts / Utilities / infrastructure: a one-time financial contribution to the Town in an amount not to exceed $914,000.00 to upgrade piping at the pump station ... to be paid to the Town within 30 calendar days of the execution of the development agreement (derived from a stated One-time financial contribution factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers: no grading activities will be allowed to commence unless and until the grading plans and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer (derived from a stated schedule factor)source
What to do next
Monitor: A Tarrant County judge is expected to hear the matter at a hearing set for 10 am on August 26th — Tarrant County district court, 2026-08-26 (scheduled) source
Monitor: Afterward, the Town will schedule a meeting to vote on the development agreement — Westlake Town Council [development agreement], date not stated (expected) source
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-09 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: agreement pending
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
text_amendment: approved (2025-01-06)
site_plan: approved (2026-08-04)
development_agreement: tabled (2026-08-17)
Momentum: stalled
how this was derived
1 undated published record(s) not placed in time
2026-08-04 site_plan: approved
2026-08-17 development_agreement: tabled
latest action tabled stalls
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: stated
how this was derived
litigation (stated, impedes): a Tarrant County judge put a temporary hold on the project. Because of the court order, the Town Council cannot act on the agreement at this time
entitlement_step (stated, advances): The Office of the Town Manager recommends approval of the development agreement as presented
conditions (stated, impedes): The development agreement --- and the ability of the Developer to receive a certificate of occupancy to operate the data center are predicated upon the Developer's compliance with the directive from the Governor concerning the comprehensive data center audit process that ... will be performed by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)
conditions (stated, impedes): In the event that the Developer is unable to receive the appropriate documentation from the PUCT and ERCOT ... the Town Manager may request that the Developer repurpose the buildings on the site for another land use
water (stated, neutral): cooling system designed to achieve an annual water usage effectiveness (WUE) not to exceed 0.25L/kWh as a long-term average
conditions (stated, neutral): heightened mitigation efforts for noise reduction ... acoustic louvers, berms, and sound barrier walls ... a report within 180 days following the completion of construction that demonstrates that the development is compliant with the Town's Code of Ordinances regulating noise
other (stated, neutral): a one-time financial contribution to the Town in an amount not to exceed $914,000.00 to upgrade piping at the pump station ... to be paid to the Town within 30 calendar days of the execution of the development agreement
schedule (stated, neutral): no grading activities will be allowed to commence unless and until the grading plans and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
Garland, TX — Z 23-47, Prime Data Centers (2024)
3 records from 6 cited source documents. Garland, TX — Z 23-47, Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, 2000 Holford Road (District 7). Historical sample records built from the City's own meeting documents (CivicClerk), retrieved 2026-09-10. The original documents and their page text are kept outside this site, with a fingerprint (SHA-256) of each original on file. Not a live lead: nothing after 2024-04-16 was checked.
Timeline and every record's evidence card
Timeline
2024-02-26 — proposal · Garland Plan Commission (recommendation only, 5-3; recommended limiting the PD to the data center and substation) · record
2024-03-19 — approved · Garland City Council — public hearing, 7 ayes / 2 nays (Lucht, Dutton) · record
2024-04-02 — approved · Garland City Council — Ordinance No. 7520 adopted (consent item 9.b) · record
Evidence cards
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Prime Data Centers — 2000 Holford Road (Z 23-47)
Municipality
Garland
County
Dallas
Address / location
2000 Holford Road, Garland, TX (District 7); a 48.93-acre tract, Lot 2, Block 1, Sanctuary Addition (Ordinance Exhibit A)
Developer
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
Unknown
Source published
Unknown
Meeting date
2024-02-26
First observed by us
2026-09-10
Stage
proposal
Reviewing body (not a final decision)
Garland Plan Commission (recommendation only, 5-3; recommended limiting the PD to the data center and substation)
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.24, 25, 27 (one label per building; three buildings)): DFW02-01 2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER 710' x 194' FFE: 546.00' — source
48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.24, 25, 27 (one label per building; three buildings)): DFW02-02 2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER 710' x 194' FFE: 546.00' — source
48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.24, 25, 27 (one label per building; three buildings)): DFW02-03 2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER 710' x 194' FFE: 546.00' — source
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
Staff recommended approval (planning report, fileId 842 pp.17–19). Plan Commission public hearing 2024-02-26: motion to approve as presented, with the recommendation that the PD be permitted only for the data center and substation, carried 5–3.
IT load / critical capacity: the Detail Plan sheets label each of three buildings '2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER' (fileId 842 pp.24–27; fileId 285 pp.194–197) without saying what the 48 MW is — recorded as unspecified capacity claims; no IT, critical, utility or substation figure is stated
tenant identity (three tenants are mentioned, none named)
applicant and owner: the agenda titles, ordinance caption and minutes treat 'Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr' as the requesting party, while the staff report's role labels (fileId 842 p.17) read 'APPLICANT Woodlands of Spring Creek LP' and 'OWNER Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr'; no source assigns both roles consistently
entitlement step — Both data centers and electric substations require a Specific Use Provision in the Community Office (CO) District. The applicant proposes to allow both uses by right through this Planned Development source, p.17
capacity power — three (3) electric substations are proposed to support the data center. Two (2) of those substations will be maintained by Oncor and the third substation will be maintained Garland Power & Light (GP&L) source, p.17
capacity power — the buildings will be dual fed by two different electric companies, the generators will only be activated if there is a total power outage or during load testing source, p.6
land — The overall site consists of approximately 48.93 acres with approximately 1,426 lineal feet of frontage along Holford Road source, p.17
tenant — the tenant will be a cloud-based company that would cover companies in and around the DFW market source, p.6
schedule — The current plan is to build the first two buildings at the same time and have them come online about three months apart ... The approximate construction time for the entire project is 24 months source, p.6
opposition — Resident speaking in opposition ... expressed concern that an industrial area is being moved into a residential area source, p.7
conditions — an eight (8)-foot ornamental metal fence around the data center and an eight (8) - foot solid wall around the electric substation source, p.18
Economic Development Strategic Plan — Per the adopted Economic Development Strategic Plan, data centers generate the most revenue per acre by building type source, p.18
Staff recommended approval (planning report, fileId 842 pp.17–19). Plan Commission public hearing 2024-02-26: motion to approve as presented, with the recommendation that the PD be permitted only for the data center and substation, carried 5–3. Capacity as stated: 48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.24, 25, 27 (one label per building; three buildings)), per building × 3; campus total not stated <https://garlandtx.api.civicclerk.com/v1/Meetings/GetMeetingFileStream(fileId=842,plainText=false)>
Who should act
Developers / site selectors: Both data centers and electric substations require a Specific Use Provision in the Community Office (CO) District. The applicant proposes to allow both uses by right through this Planned Development (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure: three (3) electric substations are proposed to support the data center. Two (2) of those substations will be maintained by Oncor and the third substation will be maintained Garland Power & Light (GP&L) (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Equipment / construction suppliers: the buildings will be dual fed by two different electric companies, the generators will only be activated if there is a total power outage or during load testing (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Developers / site selectors: The overall site consists of approximately 48.93 acres with approximately 1,426 lineal feet of frontage along Holford Road (derived from a stated land factor)source
Investors / lenders / analysts: the tenant will be a cloud-based company that would cover companies in and around the DFW market (derived from a stated tenant factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers / Investors / lenders / analysts: The current plan is to build the first two buildings at the same time and have them come online about three months apart ... The approximate construction time for the entire project is 24 months (derived from a stated schedule factor)source
Public affairs / community: Resident speaking in opposition ... expressed concern that an industrial area is being moved into a residential area (derived from a stated opposition factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers: an eight (8)-foot ornamental metal fence around the data center and an eight (8) - foot solid wall around the electric substation (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Public affairs / community / Investors / lenders / analysts: Per the adopted Economic Development Strategic Plan, data centers generate the most revenue per acre by building type (derived from a stated Economic Development Strategic Plan factor)source
What to do next
Monitor: CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 19, 2024 (Z 23-47 public hearing) — Garland City Council [rezoning pd], 2024-03-19 (scheduled) source
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-10 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: entitlement approved
how this was derived
rezoning_pd: approved (2024-04-02)
Momentum: unknown
how this was derived
0 dated action(s) in the last 365 d; two are needed
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: stated
how this was derived
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Both data centers and electric substations require a Specific Use Provision in the Community Office (CO) District. The applicant proposes to allow both uses by right through this Planned Development
capacity_power (stated, neutral): three (3) electric substations are proposed to support the data center. Two (2) of those substations will be maintained by Oncor and the third substation will be maintained Garland Power & Light (GP&L)
capacity_power (stated, neutral): the buildings will be dual fed by two different electric companies, the generators will only be activated if there is a total power outage or during load testing
land (stated, neutral): The overall site consists of approximately 48.93 acres with approximately 1,426 lineal feet of frontage along Holford Road
tenant (stated, neutral): the tenant will be a cloud-based company that would cover companies in and around the DFW market
schedule (stated, neutral): The current plan is to build the first two buildings at the same time and have them come online about three months apart ... The approximate construction time for the entire project is 24 months
opposition (stated, impedes): Resident speaking in opposition ... expressed concern that an industrial area is being moved into a residential area
conditions (stated, neutral): an eight (8)-foot ornamental metal fence around the data center and an eight (8) - foot solid wall around the electric substation
other (stated, advances): Per the adopted Economic Development Strategic Plan, data centers generate the most revenue per acre by building type
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Prime Data Centers — 2000 Holford Road (Z 23-47)
Municipality
Garland
County
Dallas
Address / location
2000 Holford Road, Garland, TX (District 7); a 48.93-acre tract, Lot 2, Block 1, Sanctuary Addition (Ordinance Exhibit A)
Developer
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
Unknown
Source published
Unknown
Meeting date
2024-03-19
First observed by us
2026-09-10
Stage
approved
Decided by
Garland City Council — public hearing, 7 ayes / 2 nays (Lucht, Dutton)
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
Unknown
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
Public hearing 2024-03-19: motion to approve the change in zoning to a PD based in CO and the Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations carried 7 ayes, 2 nays; discussion of proximity to the Spring Creek Preserve.
IT load / critical capacity: the Detail Plan sheets label each of three buildings '2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER' (fileId 842 pp.24–27; fileId 285 pp.194–197) without saying what the 48 MW is — recorded as unspecified capacity claims; no IT, critical, utility or substation figure is stated
tenant identity (three tenants are mentioned, none named)
applicant and owner: the agenda titles, ordinance caption and minutes treat 'Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr' as the requesting party, while the staff report's role labels (fileId 842 p.17) read 'APPLICANT Woodlands of Spring Creek LP' and 'OWNER Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr'; no source assigns both roles consistently
the 2024-03-19 agenda packet (fileId 290) was not fetched
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
land — There was discussion among the Council and applicants regarding the location of the proposed project and the proximity to the Spring Creek Preserve source, p.6
entitlement step — Case Z 23-47 was approved via public hearing during the March 19, 2024 Regular City Council meeting ... Consider adoption of the attached ordinance source, p.186
Public hearing 2024-03-19: motion to approve the change in zoning to a PD based in CO and the Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations carried 7 ayes, 2 nays; discussion of proximity to the Spring Creek Preserve.
Who should act
Public affairs / community / Developers / site selectors: There was discussion among the Council and applicants regarding the location of the proposed project and the proximity to the Spring Creek Preserve (derived from a stated land factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Case Z 23-47 was approved via public hearing during the March 19, 2024 Regular City Council meeting ... Consider adoption of the attached ordinance (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
What to do next
Monitor: Z 23-47 Prime Data Centers/Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr -- consider adoption of the attached ordinance (agenda item 9.b) — Garland City Council [rezoning pd], 2024-04-02 (scheduled) source
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-10 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: entitlement approved
how this was derived
rezoning_pd: approved (2024-04-02)
Momentum: unknown
how this was derived
0 dated action(s) in the last 365 d; two are needed
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: none stated
how this was derived
land (stated, neutral): There was discussion among the Council and applicants regarding the location of the proposed project and the proximity to the Spring Creek Preserve
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Case Z 23-47 was approved via public hearing during the March 19, 2024 Regular City Council meeting ... Consider adoption of the attached ordinance
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Prime Data Centers — 2000 Holford Road (Z 23-47)
Municipality
Garland
County
Dallas
Address / location
2000 Holford Road, Garland, TX (District 7); a 48.93-acre tract, Lot 2, Block 1, Sanctuary Addition (Ordinance Exhibit A)
Developer
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
Unknown
Source published
Unknown
Meeting date
2024-04-02
First observed by us
2026-09-10
Stage
approved
Decided by
Garland City Council — Ordinance No. 7520 adopted (consent item 9.b)
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.194, 195, 197 (Exhibits C–E; one label per building; three buildings)): DFW02-01 2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER 710' x 194' FFE: 546.00' — source
48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.194, 195, 197 (Exhibits C–E; one label per building; three buildings)): DFW02-02 2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER 710' x 194' FFE: 546.00' — source
48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.194, 195, 197 (Exhibits C–E; one label per building; three buildings)): DFW02-03 2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER 710' x 194' FFE: 546.00' — source
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
Ordinance No. 7520 adopted 2024-04-02: a Change in Zoning from AG to a PD based in CO and a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on 48.93 acres at 2000 Holford Road; PD conditions (Exhibit B) permit CO uses plus a Data Center Use and an Electric Substation Use, with the landscape and screening plan (8-ft ornamental fence at the data center, 8-ft solid wall at the substation).
IT load / critical capacity: the Detail Plan sheets label each of three buildings '2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER' (fileId 842 pp.24–27; fileId 285 pp.194–197) without saying what the 48 MW is — recorded as unspecified capacity claims; no IT, critical, utility or substation figure is stated
tenant identity (three tenants are mentioned, none named)
applicant and owner: the agenda titles, ordinance caption and minutes treat 'Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr' as the requesting party, while the staff report's role labels (fileId 842 p.17) read 'APPLICANT Woodlands of Spring Creek LP' and 'OWNER Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr'; no source assigns both roles consistently
construction, site-plan or later amendments after 2024-04-16 (not checked)
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
entitlement step — Ordinance No. 7520 ... approving a Change in Zoning from Agricultural (AG) District to a Planned Development (PD) District based in the Community Office (CO) District and 2) a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on a 48.93-acre tract of land located at 2000 Holford Road source, p.4
capacity power — 48MW DATA CENTER -- one label on each of the three Detail Plan buildings DFW02-01, DFW02-02, DFW02-03 (Exhibits C-E) source, pp.194, 195, 197
capacity power (implied) — SUBSTATION / ONCOR / 75' ONCOR EASEMENT shown on the Detail Plan source, p.194
conditions — The purpose of this Planned Development is to approve a Data Center and Electric Substations source, p.191 (Exhibit B)
Ordinance No. 7520 adopted 2024-04-02: a Change in Zoning from AG to a PD based in CO and a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on 48.93 acres at 2000 Holford Road; PD conditions (Exhibit B) permit CO uses plus a Data Center Use and an Electric Substation Use, with the landscape and screening plan (8-ft ornamental fence at the data center, 8-ft solid wall at the substation). Capacity as stated: 48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.194, 195, 197 (Exhibits C–E; one label per building; three buildings)), per building × 3; campus total not stated <https://garlandtx.api.civicclerk.com/v1/Meetings/GetMeetingFileStream(fileId=285,plainText=false)>
Who should act
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Ordinance No. 7520 ... approving a Change in Zoning from Agricultural (AG) District to a Planned Development (PD) District based in the Community Office (CO) District and 2) a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on a 48.93-acre tract of land located at 2000 Holford Road (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Investors / lenders / analysts: 48MW DATA CENTER -- one label on each of the three Detail Plan buildings DFW02-01, DFW02-02, DFW02-03 (Exhibits C-E) (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure: SUBSTATION / ONCOR / 75' ONCOR EASEMENT shown on the Detail Plan (derived from an implied capacity power factor)source
Developers / site selectors: The purpose of this Planned Development is to approve a Data Center and Electric Substations (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
What to do next
no dated next step in the sources
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-10 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: entitlement approved
how this was derived
rezoning_pd: approved (2024-04-02)
Momentum: unknown
how this was derived
0 dated action(s) in the last 365 d; two are needed
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: none stated
how this was derived
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Ordinance No. 7520 ... approving a Change in Zoning from Agricultural (AG) District to a Planned Development (PD) District based in the Community Office (CO) District and 2) a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on a 48.93-acre tract of land located at 2000 Holford Road
capacity_power (stated, neutral): 48MW DATA CENTER -- one label on each of the three Detail Plan buildings DFW02-01, DFW02-02, DFW02-03 (Exhibits C-E)
capacity_power (implied, neutral): SUBSTATION / ONCOR / 75' ONCOR EASEMENT shown on the Detail Plan
conditions (stated, neutral): The purpose of this Planned Development is to approve a Data Center and Electric Substations
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
As the weekly brief lists them
Reporting period: 2026-09-10 to 2026-09-10. 1 project with newly observed or changed records (3 records) in this period.
Coverage: UNVERIFIED — sample or test records only; no live monitoring occurred.
SAMPLE: historical sample records shown for inspection, not live coverage; this is not a live reporting window
Executive summary
Prime Data Centers — 2000 Holford Road (Z 23-47) (Garland) — rezoning_pd: still approved (2024-04-02; previously 2024-03-19) — Garland City Council — Ordinance No. 7520 adopted (consent item 9.b)
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
2024-04-02 — Garland City Council — Ordinance No. 7520 adopted (consent item 9.b) · Garland, Dallas County (first observed by us 2026-09-10)
What changed
rezoning_pd: still approved (2024-04-02; previously 2024-03-19). approved — Garland City Council — Ordinance No. 7520 adopted (consent item 9.b), 2024-04-02; 891 days since this action
Why it matters
entitlement step — Ordinance No. 7520 ... approving a Change in Zoning from Agricultural (AG) District to a Planned Development (PD) District based in the Community Office (CO) District and 2) a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on a 48.93-acre tract of land located at 2000 Holford Road source, p.4
capacity power — 48MW DATA CENTER -- one label on each of the three Detail Plan buildings DFW02-01, DFW02-02, DFW02-03 (Exhibits C-E) source, pp.194, 195, 197
capacity power (implied) — SUBSTATION / ONCOR / 75' ONCOR EASEMENT shown on the Detail Plan source, p.194
conditions — The purpose of this Planned Development is to approve a Data Center and Electric Substations source, p.191 (Exhibit B)
Ordinance No. 7520 adopted 2024-04-02: a Change in Zoning from AG to a PD based in CO and a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on 48.93 acres at 2000 Holford Road; PD conditions (Exhibit B) permit CO uses plus a Data Center Use and an Electric Substation Use, with the landscape and screening plan (8-ft ornamental fence at the data center, 8-ft solid wall at the substation). Capacity as stated: 48 MW — type not stated (Detail Plan sheets pp.194, 195, 197 (Exhibits C–E; one label per building; three buildings)), per building × 3; campus total not stated <https://garlandtx.api.civicclerk.com/v1/Meetings/GetMeetingFileStream(fileId=285,plainText=false)>
Who should act
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Ordinance No. 7520 ... approving a Change in Zoning from Agricultural (AG) District to a Planned Development (PD) District based in the Community Office (CO) District and 2) a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on a 48.93-acre tract of land located at 2000 Holford Road (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Investors / lenders / analysts: 48MW DATA CENTER -- one label on each of the three Detail Plan buildings DFW02-01, DFW02-02, DFW02-03 (Exhibits C-E) (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure: SUBSTATION / ONCOR / 75' ONCOR EASEMENT shown on the Detail Plan (derived from an implied capacity power factor)source
Developers / site selectors: The purpose of this Planned Development is to approve a Data Center and Electric Substations (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
0 dated action(s) in the last 365 d; two are needed
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: none stated
how this was derived
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Ordinance No. 7520 ... approving a Change in Zoning from Agricultural (AG) District to a Planned Development (PD) District based in the Community Office (CO) District and 2) a Detail Plan for a Data Center and Electric Substations on a 48.93-acre tract of land located at 2000 Holford Road
capacity_power (stated, neutral): 48MW DATA CENTER -- one label on each of the three Detail Plan buildings DFW02-01, DFW02-02, DFW02-03 (Exhibits C-E)
capacity_power (implied, neutral): SUBSTATION / ONCOR / 75' ONCOR EASEMENT shown on the Detail Plan
conditions (stated, neutral): The purpose of this Planned Development is to approve a Data Center and Electric Substations
Evidence grade: A (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Still unknown
IT load / critical capacity: the Detail Plan sheets label each of three buildings '2 STORY 48MW DATA CENTER' (fileId 842 pp.24–27; fileId 285 pp.194–197) without saying what the 48 MW is — recorded as unspecified capacity claims; no IT, critical, utility or substation figure is stated
tenant identity (three tenants are mentioned, none named)
applicant and owner: the agenda titles, ordinance caption and minutes treat 'Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr' as the requesting party, while the staff report's role labels (fileId 842 p.17) read 'APPLICANT Woodlands of Spring Creek LP' and 'OWNER Prime Data Centers / Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr'; no source assigns both roles consistently
construction, site-plan or later amendments after 2024-04-16 (not checked)
Timeline
3 dated records of this project in the period; the current state above is the latest.
2024-02-26 — proposal — Garland Plan Commission (recommendation only, 5-3; recommended limiting the PD to the data center and substation)
2024-03-19 — approved — Garland City Council — public hearing, 7 ayes / 2 nays (Lucht, Dutton)
2024-04-02 — approved — Garland City Council — Ordinance No. 7520 adopted (consent item 9.b) (current)
1 record from 4 cited source documents. Prosper, TX — ZONE-26-0007, 'Project Tomahawk', a Planned Development for a Data Center on 37.3 acres south of Parvin Road east of FM 1385. One historical sample record assembled 2026-09-10 from the Town's own meetings site (Municode Meetings). The original documents are kept outside this site, with a fingerprint (SHA-256) of each original on file. Kept visibly separate from live reviewed coverage: nothing here has been reviewed or published, and the case's outcome is unknown in every fetched document.
Timeline and every record's evidence card
Timeline
2026-09-01 — proposal · Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission — public hearing 2026-09-01; Town Staff recommended approval · record
Evidence cards
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
Project Tomahawk — Parvin Road at FM 1385 (ZONE-26-0007)
Municipality
Prosper
County
Denton
Address / location
a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, 37.3± acres, 1,590± feet south of Parvin Road and 855± feet east of FM 1385, Prosper, TX; behind the Brazos substation that fronts FM 1385
Developer
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Owner
D9-1 Assets, LLC
Source published
Unknown
Meeting date
2026-09-01
First observed by us
2026-09-10
Stage
proposal
Reviewing body (not a final decision)
Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission — public hearing 2026-09-01; Town Staff recommended approval
IT load (MW)
Unknown
Stated capacity figures
Unknown
Equipment
Unknown
Approvals
Requested: rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center on 37.3± acres (ZONE-26-0007) with a companion Future Land Use Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential and Retail and Neighborhood Services to Business Park; a draft Development Agreement (DEVAGRE-26-0011) is attached. Staff recommendation: approve. No decision by the commission or the council appears in any fetched document.
IT load / critical capacity: no megawatt, kilovolt or square-footage figure for the facility appears in the agenda or the 104-page packet; only the tract (37.273 acres) and 20 percent lot coverage are stated
the commission's action on 2026-09-01: press reports a 7–0 recommendation of denial; not in any fetched document
the council's action on 2026-09-08: press reports the request was withdrawn before the meeting; the agenda only shows the hearing scheduled
applicant: no fetched document names the applicant party; press names White Rose Partners, which appears nowhere in the packet; owner of record D9-1 Assets, LLC per the deed cited in Exhibit A-1 and the Exhibit F-1 title block
county: the site is in Denton County per the deed and exhibit title block, while the municipality seed row lists Prosper under Collin
Our review
Review state
needs_review
Inference
Unknown
Why it matters
entitlement step — Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center source, p.49
opposition — Town Staff has received 34 letters of opposition, 11 from Prosper residents, and one letter of support to the proposed zoning request to date source, p.49
land — a Planned Development for a Data Center on a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, on 37.3 acres, located 1,590 feet south of Parvin Road and 855 feet east of FM 1385 ... The facility will cover 20 percent of the lot source, p.45
entitlement step — A request to modify the Future Land Use Plan has been submitted as a companion case to this item source, p.45
capacity power (implied) — located behind ... the Brazos substation that fronts FM 1385 source, p.45
capacity power — The proposed development will be responsible for all upgrades needed for power consumption source, p.48
water — The proposed development will consume less than half of the water used in a single-family home source, p.48
conditions — an eight-foot masonry wall will be installed at the rear of the building to both screen and provide a sound-dampening mechanism for the generators source, p.48
Requested: rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center on 37.3± acres (ZONE-26-0007) with a companion Future Land Use Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential and Retail and Neighborhood Services to Business Park; a draft Development Agreement (DEVAGRE-26-0011) is attached. Staff recommendation: approve. No decision by the commission or the council appears in any fetched document.
Who should act
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Public affairs / community / Investors / lenders / analysts: Town Staff has received 34 letters of opposition, 11 from Prosper residents, and one letter of support to the proposed zoning request to date (derived from a stated opposition factor)source
Developers / site selectors: a Planned Development for a Data Center on a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, on 37.3 acres, located 1,590 feet south of Parvin Road and 855 feet east of FM 1385 ... The facility will cover 20 percent of the lot (derived from a stated land factor)source
Developers / site selectors: A request to modify the Future Land Use Plan has been submitted as a companion case to this item (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure: located behind ... the Brazos substation that fronts FM 1385 (derived from an implied capacity power factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Investors / lenders / analysts: The proposed development will be responsible for all upgrades needed for power consumption (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Public affairs / community: The proposed development will consume less than half of the water used in a single-family home (derived from a stated water factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers / Public affairs / community: an eight-foot masonry wall will be installed at the rear of the building to both screen and provide a sound-dampening mechanism for the generators (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Public affairs / community / Equipment / construction suppliers: Decibel Level Range: 41.7 - 55 dB(A) (proposed data center) versus 59.7 - 70.8 dB(A) (current vacant site) (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Attached Documents: ... 13. Draft Development Agreement (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
What to do next
Monitor: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center ... (ZONE-26-0007), agenda item 4 — Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission [rezoning pd], 2026-09-01 (scheduled) source
Monitor: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning ... (ZONE-26-0007), agenda item 19 — Prosper Town Council [rezoning pd], 2026-09-08 (scheduled) source
Monitor: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request to amend the Future Land Use Plan from Medium Density Residential and Retail and Neighborhood Services to Business Park (COMP-26-0001), agenda item 20 — Prosper Town Council [comprehensive plan amendment], 2026-09-08 (scheduled) source
Monitor: Draft Development Agreement (attached document 13) [development agreement], date not stated (expected) source
Our analysis
As of 2026-09-10 for lifecycle and momentum; stated risk and evidence grade are read from this record. All derived from the project's published records, never from a city or company name.
Lifecycle: entitlement pending
how this was derived
rezoning_pd: recommended_approval (2026-09-01)
Momentum: unknown
how this was derived
1 dated action(s) in the last 365 d; two are needed
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: stated
how this was derived
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center
opposition (stated, impedes): Town Staff has received 34 letters of opposition, 11 from Prosper residents, and one letter of support to the proposed zoning request to date
land (stated, neutral): a Planned Development for a Data Center on a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, on 37.3 acres, located 1,590 feet south of Parvin Road and 855 feet east of FM 1385 ... The facility will cover 20 percent of the lot
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): A request to modify the Future Land Use Plan has been submitted as a companion case to this item
capacity_power (implied, neutral): located behind ... the Brazos substation that fronts FM 1385
capacity_power (stated, neutral): The proposed development will be responsible for all upgrades needed for power consumption
water (stated, advances): The proposed development will consume less than half of the water used in a single-family home
conditions (stated, neutral): an eight-foot masonry wall will be installed at the rear of the building to both screen and provide a sound-dampening mechanism for the generators
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): Attached Documents: ... 13. Draft Development Agreement
Evidence grade: B (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Historical sample record — not live coverage; the analysis above is frozen at the sample window's end.
As the weekly brief lists them
Reporting period: 2026-09-10 to 2026-09-10. 1 newly observed or changed project record in this period.
Coverage: UNVERIFIED — sample or test records only; no live monitoring occurred.
SAMPLE: historical sample records shown for inspection, not live coverage; this is not a live reporting window
Executive summary
Project Tomahawk — Parvin Road at FM 1385 (ZONE-26-0007) (Prosper) — new track: rezoning_pd recommended_approval (2026-09-01) — Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission — public hearing 2026-09-01; Town Staff recommended approval; next: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center ... (ZONE-26-0007), agenda item 4 2026-09-01 (past)
HISTORICAL/BACKFILL — first observed after the underlying event, not through live monitoring. Current status is established only by the dated next decision and project timeline.
2026-09-01 — Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission — public hearing 2026-09-01; Town Staff recommended approval · Prosper, Denton County (first observed by us 2026-09-10)
What changed
new track: rezoning_pd recommended_approval (2026-09-01). proposal — Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission — public hearing 2026-09-01; Town Staff recommended approval, 2026-09-01; 9 days since this action
Why it matters
entitlement step — Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center source, p.49
opposition — Town Staff has received 34 letters of opposition, 11 from Prosper residents, and one letter of support to the proposed zoning request to date source, p.49
land — a Planned Development for a Data Center on a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, on 37.3 acres, located 1,590 feet south of Parvin Road and 855 feet east of FM 1385 ... The facility will cover 20 percent of the lot source, p.45
entitlement step — A request to modify the Future Land Use Plan has been submitted as a companion case to this item source, p.45
capacity power (implied) — located behind ... the Brazos substation that fronts FM 1385 source, p.45
capacity power — The proposed development will be responsible for all upgrades needed for power consumption source, p.48
water — The proposed development will consume less than half of the water used in a single-family home source, p.48
conditions — an eight-foot masonry wall will be installed at the rear of the building to both screen and provide a sound-dampening mechanism for the generators source, p.48
Requested: rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center on 37.3± acres (ZONE-26-0007) with a companion Future Land Use Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential and Retail and Neighborhood Services to Business Park; a draft Development Agreement (DEVAGRE-26-0011) is attached. Staff recommendation: approve. No decision by the commission or the council appears in any fetched document.
Who should act
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Public affairs / community / Investors / lenders / analysts: Town Staff has received 34 letters of opposition, 11 from Prosper residents, and one letter of support to the proposed zoning request to date (derived from a stated opposition factor)source
Developers / site selectors: a Planned Development for a Data Center on a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, on 37.3 acres, located 1,590 feet south of Parvin Road and 855 feet east of FM 1385 ... The facility will cover 20 percent of the lot (derived from a stated land factor)source
Developers / site selectors: A request to modify the Future Land Use Plan has been submitted as a companion case to this item (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure: located behind ... the Brazos substation that fronts FM 1385 (derived from an implied capacity power factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Investors / lenders / analysts: The proposed development will be responsible for all upgrades needed for power consumption (derived from a stated capacity power factor)source
Utilities / infrastructure / Public affairs / community: The proposed development will consume less than half of the water used in a single-family home (derived from a stated water factor)source
Equipment / construction suppliers / Public affairs / community: an eight-foot masonry wall will be installed at the rear of the building to both screen and provide a sound-dampening mechanism for the generators (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Public affairs / community / Equipment / construction suppliers: Decibel Level Range: 41.7 - 55 dB(A) (proposed data center) versus 59.7 - 70.8 dB(A) (current vacant site) (derived from a stated conditions factor)source
Developers / site selectors / Investors / lenders / analysts: Attached Documents: ... 13. Draft Development Agreement (derived from a stated entitlement step factor)source
What to do next
Look up: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center ... (ZONE-26-0007), agenda item 4 — Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission [rezoning pd], 2026-09-01 (past — outcome not in the sources) source
Look up: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning ... (ZONE-26-0007), agenda item 19 — Prosper Town Council [rezoning pd], 2026-09-08 (past — outcome not in the sources) source
Look up: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request to amend the Future Land Use Plan from Medium Density Residential and Retail and Neighborhood Services to Business Park (COMP-26-0001), agenda item 20 — Prosper Town Council [comprehensive plan amendment], 2026-09-08 (past — outcome not in the sources) source
Monitor: Draft Development Agreement (attached document 13) [development agreement], date not stated (expected) source
1 dated action(s) in the last 365 d; two are needed
thresholds (provisional): advancing ≤ 90 d, stalled after 180 d, lookback 365 d
Stated risk: stated
how this was derived
entitlement_step (stated, advances): Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center
opposition (stated, impedes): Town Staff has received 34 letters of opposition, 11 from Prosper residents, and one letter of support to the proposed zoning request to date
land (stated, neutral): a Planned Development for a Data Center on a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, on 37.3 acres, located 1,590 feet south of Parvin Road and 855 feet east of FM 1385 ... The facility will cover 20 percent of the lot
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): A request to modify the Future Land Use Plan has been submitted as a companion case to this item
capacity_power (implied, neutral): located behind ... the Brazos substation that fronts FM 1385
capacity_power (stated, neutral): The proposed development will be responsible for all upgrades needed for power consumption
water (stated, advances): The proposed development will consume less than half of the water used in a single-family home
conditions (stated, neutral): an eight-foot masonry wall will be installed at the rear of the building to both screen and provide a sound-dampening mechanism for the generators
entitlement_step (stated, neutral): Attached Documents: ... 13. Draft Development Agreement
Evidence grade: B (A: an outcome source; B: packet or agenda only; C: corroboration only)
Still unknown
IT load / critical capacity: no megawatt, kilovolt or square-footage figure for the facility appears in the agenda or the 104-page packet; only the tract (37.273 acres) and 20 percent lot coverage are stated
the commission's action on 2026-09-01: press reports a 7–0 recommendation of denial; not in any fetched document
the council's action on 2026-09-08: press reports the request was withdrawn before the meeting; the agenda only shows the hearing scheduled
applicant: no fetched document names the applicant party; press names White Rose Partners, which appears nowhere in the packet; owner of record D9-1 Assets, LLC per the deed cited in Exhibit A-1 and the Exhibit F-1 title block
county: the site is in Denton County per the deed and exhibit title block, while the municipality seed row lists Prosper under Collin
Export the sample the way a subscriber would: CSV · JSON — same serializer as the live exports; every row's review_state reads sample.